Call for papers: ILERA European Congress 2019 „Perspectives of Employment Relations in Europe“, Düsseldorf, Germany, 5–7 September 2019

http://ilera2019.giraweb.de/cfp

ILERA European Congress 2019
Perspectives of Employment Relations in Europe,
Düsseldorf, Germany, 5–7 September 2019
(http://ilera2019.giraweb.de/)
(www.ilera2019.eu)

CALL FOR PAPER AND WORKSHOP PROPOSALS
(deadline 20 December 2018)
The XII European Regional Congress of the International Labour and Employment Relations Association (ILERA) will take place in Düsseldorf on 5–7 September 2019 and intends to explore and analyse the changes in labour and employment relations across Europe and in a comparative perspective. Stable labour relations and welfare state protections have been perceived to be at the core of what has been named the European social model. Beginning in the 1990s, however, their foundations seem to have been weakened in many countries: We witness a decline in bargaining coverage, employer and union densities but also many efforts to restructure the welfare state as well as systems of labour market regulation. The 12th ILERA European Congress comes at a time when changes of institutions, actors and practices of labour relations are widespread. We expect recent current events such as the digitalisation of the economy, intensified conflict on trade, the exit of the United Kingdom from the EU as well as the
vastly changing political landscape which comes along with the rise of right-wing populist parties to infl uence such changes in various ways. For good or bad, industrial relations will not remain the same. We invite participants to contribute towards analysing the direction, content and speed of such processes of change but also the current state of labour relations in Europe and beyond. We are particularly interested in receiving paper proposals which engage in research on how societal actors seek to actively shape labour relations, institutions, processes and outcomes.
Papers and workshops addressing the multi-faceted issues outlined above are welcome. In particular, proposals can refer to the following four tracks:
Track 1: Social Europe: Equality and Poverty
Track 2: Regulation of Labour: Actors, Institutions and Law
Track 3: Workers’ Voice and Industrial Democracy
Track 4: Human Resources, Quality of Work and Digitalisation

Abstracts are invited for submission through the congress website at:
http://www.ilera2019giraweb.de/cfp
Notifications of acceptance will be sent by 28 February 2019
Registration for the Congress will start on 31 January 2019

More detailed information: http://ilera2019.giraweb.de/cfp

Advertisements

Tagung des Arbeitskreises für Empirische Personal- und Organisationsforschung (AKempor) 22. -23.11.18 an der Universität Salzburg

 

CfP der WSI-Mitteilungen zum Thema „Unsichere Zeiten“

Die Zeitschrift „WSI-Mitteilungen“ will die Publikationschancen für  jüngere WissenschaftlerInnen in der Qualifikationsphase (abgeschlossenes Masterstudium, PromovendInnen und PostdoktorandInnen) fördern und hat zu diesem Zweck einen AutorInnenwettbewerb ausgeschrieben.

Die Ausschreibung unter dem Arbeitstitel „Unsichere Zeiten? – Rückgewinnung sozialer Sicherheit und politischer Handlungsfähigkeit“  ist thematisch breit gefasst, um jüngere WissenschaftlerInnen aus verschiedenen sozial- und wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Disziplinen anzusprechen (Einreichungsfrist 30.04.2018).

Den Call findet man hier: https://www.boeckler.de/pdf/wsi_mitteilungen_call_for_papers_foerderung_junger_autoren_2018.pdf

 

Call for Papers for „management revue“: Echoes of an Era – A Century of Organisational Studies

Call for Papers: Echoes of an Era – A Century of Organisational Studies

„Managing Editor:
Wenzel Matiaske, Helmut-Schmidt-University Hamburg (Germany)

Hundred years ago, Henri Fayols “Administration Industrielle et Générale”, a milestone in the history of organisational thought, was published. This centenary motivates the editors of the Management Revue to launch a stream on the history of organisational studies. In the forthcoming volumes, and rather on an infrequent basis, we would like to publish contributions which not only introduce the reader to one or several, interrelated seminal works of organisational theory, but also provide accompanying commentaries and an analysis of their history of effects.

The reason for this format is, given our discipline’s forgetfulness of history, to provide orientation, which not only serves teaching and young management scholars. While reference to classic thought contributes to scientific advancement in other fields of the social sciences, in our field some research issues are being addressed repeatedly – without putting the associated arguments and findings in an adequate historical context. In this respect, addressing the history of thought should be understood as a contribution to the advancement of management research.

We would like to avoid a strict delimitation of the era being addressed. Contributions on contemporaries of Fayol like Frederik Winston Taylor, Frank B. and Lillian Gilbreth or Henry L. Gantt und Karol Adamiecki are as welcome as contributions are on Fayol’s predecessors or successors. By no means we are exclusively committed to the “engineers of the organisation”; economists, legal scholars and particularly the labour science community and psychologists should also be given due attention. A temporal upper boundary shall nevertheless be the 1970s, when, most notably induced by Alfred D. Chandler, strategic management and the reflection on it started to thrive.

This stream will be open to submissions until the end of 2017 in the first place. It will be maintained and edited by Wenzel Matiaske (Helmut-Schmidt-University Hamburg, Germany). Submissions shall accord with the formatting guidelines of the management revue. Please submit your manuscripts electronically via our online submission system using “Stream Echoes of an Era” as article section.
Looking forward to your contribution!

 

Call for Papers: „Workplace Flexibility“ – Special Issue of „Management Revue“

„Call for Papers: Workplace Flexibility
 
Guest Editors: Sascha Ruhle, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf (Germany); Stefan Süß, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf (Germany)
Special Issue
Flexibility has been an ongoing issue for various fields of research and practice and a considerable amount of literature dealing with the concept of flexibility has developed. This diversity has led to various perspectives on dimensions and aspects of flexibility. However, two major fields of flexibility can be distinguished. The organizational perspective understands workplace flexibility as the degree of adaptability of an organization in an uncertain and changing environment (Dastmalchian & Blyton 2001). In addition, workplace flexibility can encompass the individual perspective of the workforce, especially the degree of flexibility regarding aspects of where, when, and how work is performed (Hill et al. 2008). Within both streams of research, various aspects of flexibility have been addressed, such as organizational structures (Feldman & Pentland 2003), type of employment (Lepak et al. 2003; Sayah & Süß 2013), management and strategic human resource management (Wright & Snell 1998), time and location of work (Allen et al. 2013), demands towards employees (Vahle-Hinz et al. 2013) and work (Ruiner et al. 2013), leadership (Barrow 1976), and the role of Communication Technologies (Diaz et al. 2012).
Regarding the consequences of flexibility, literature often assumes positive results for both individual and organization, when flexibility increases. For example, evidence has been found that flexibility at work is positively related to self-reported health (Butler et al. 2009). Furthermore, it can increase organizational attractiveness (Nadler et al. 2010; Thompson et al. 2015), profit (Kesavan et al. 2014) and firm performance (Martínez Sánchez et al. 2007). However, there is also a missing consensus and ongoing discussion regarding possible consequences of flexibility. Research has identified potential downsides of flexibility, such as blurred work-life boundaries (Pedersen and Lewis 2012), the risk of stigmatization (Cech & Blair-Loy 2014), unsupportive work climate and inequitable implementation (Putnam et al. 2014). Other relationships, for example between flexibility and work-family conflict (Allen et al. 2013; Shockley & Allen 2007), remain unclear. Further, if the flexibility is only an organizational facade (Eaton 2003; Nystrom & Starbuck 1984) which is communicated but not lived in the organization, even more, negative consequences such as violations of psychological contracts might occur, especially when flexibility is used as a facade to justify the transformation of standard work arrangements to non-standard work arrangements.
Subsequently, a lot of questions remain unanswered:
  • What is the core of flexibility in organizations?
  • Which origins can be identified of the ongoing need for various types of flexibility?
  • What types of flexibility can be systematized and how are those different types related to organizational consequences, such as success or attractiveness?
  • How useful are flexible work arrangements and how can positive consequences be promoted and negative consequences be avoided, or at least weakened?
  • Which consequences result from a gap between offered and truly supported types of flexibility, e.g. the role of organizational facades?
  • How does embeddedness of Information and Communications Technologies in work practices enable and assist workplace flexibility?
  • What are the consequences of the ongoing flexibilization of work on the economic and social level?
Potential authors
The aim of this special issue is to increase our understanding of the above-mentioned aspects of workplace flexibility, especially from an organizational perspective. We encourage empirical – qualitative or quantitative – submissions from various research fields, such as business administration, industrial and organizational psychology, work sociology and other disciplines dealing with the topic of the Special Issue.
Deadline
Full papers for this special issue of management revue must be submitted by 31 December 2017. All contributions will be subject to double-blind review. Papers invited to a ‘revise and resubmit’ are due 31 May 2018. Please submit your papers electronically via the online submission system at http://www.mrev.nomos.de/ guidelines/submit-manuscript/ using ‘SI Workplace Flexibility’ as article section.
Submission Guidelines
Manuscript length should not exceed 8,000 words (excluding references) and the norm should be 30 pages in double-spaced type with margins of about 3 cm (1 inch) on each side of the page. Further, please follow the guidelines on the website http://www.mrev.nomos.de/guidelines/ and submit the papers electronically by sending a ‘blind’ copy of your manuscript (delete all author identification from this primary document).
We look forward to receiving your contribution!
Sascha Ruhle (sascha.ruhle@hhu.de) | Stefan Süß (stefan.suess@hhu.de)“